It was a long while ago when I
first did a comparison of two late night talk show hosts. There was a shift a
while ago where nearly every host was replaced by a different host for one
reason or another. I think that it is time to compare The Late Show version
that David Letterman did versus the one that Stephen Colbert is doing. Let’s
get to it, shall we?
What was David Letterman like?
He had quite a quirky personality and would often do pranks of some various
sorts from time to time. His most notable bit was the top ten where he would
mention ten jokes relating to a topic of some sort. His format seems to have
remained the most structured of all of the late night shows with little being
different from show to show.
How he was good: He seemed
fairly laid back and was quite a good host the whole time. He never had many
problems with hosting that we can see from time to time with others. His style
worked well for the most part and none of his bits seemed dumb like we can get
from time to time.
How he was bad: He might not
have seemed as weird as most good hosts are like. It could often seem like he
was siding with one political side all the time with barely any mention of the
other side. Some of his recurring bits could be quite dumb and made even more
annoying because they kept happening over and over again.
What is Stephen Colbert like?
He is highly eccentric which often works well. He reports on the news a lot in
great detail, often poking fun at different issues that they do. His version is
very political and even has political guests a lot more than you’d see on other
shows like this.
How he is good: His antics are
normally always entertaining with very few issues. He proves that he does not
need a sidekick to keep things interesting. One can often get a lot out of his
show, specifically his take on what is going on in the world.
How he is bad: It would seem
quite often that his politics are often too biased in one way which might anger
some of the other party. It can seem like he rushes through his guests too much
in an attempt to fit everything into what’s going on in the show.
Who do I like better? This is
hard for me to say. I’m not sure that there is one that I prefer to the other.
I had known David’s show for so long that it is hard to think of anyone else
doing it better. But Stephen does the show quite well. I’d have to say that
since David was more simple with what he did, that I’d put Stephen as the
slightly better host. If you aren’t into politics, then David is clearly the
better person for you to watch. Of course, you might be better off with a different
late night show.
I can’t think of anything else
to say outside of this closing that I normally put in most of my blogs. It is
hard to tell for sure when different posts of this blog will be. I’m still not
done with the posts that are on Mondays just yet and I’ll be sure to tell you
when I am done with that. Always keep an eye out for a post in this blog as you
never know when it might come.
No comments:
Post a Comment